This is the second in my series of Supreme Court cases related to pornography. Last time I promised I would do Memoirs v. Massachusetts next, but I completely forgot about Jacobellis v. Ohio which, for reasons that will become clear quite quickly, can’t be skipped. If this kind of thing intrigues you, check out the previous post on Roth v. United States or my other ongoing series on the details of social media sex policy.
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964
Official citation and full opinion text: 378 U.S. 184
“I shall not today attempt further to define [hard core pornography], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
Justice Stewart in his concurring opinion for Jacobellis
Jacobellis is not one of the great precedent-setting obscenity cases. It looked at a specific piece of content, and decided it did not qualify as obscene under the Roth definition. The full decision for Jacobellis is rather short – only 6,484 words, compared to Roth’s 12,066 (six years earlier) or Memoirs’ beefy 15,911 (two years later, and the next case to modify the obscenity definition).
However.
It is in Jacobellis that the famous line “I know it when I see it” occurs, which has come to be shorthand for the vague and subjective nature of ‘pornography’ classification. Many Americans are familiar with that quote but not the actual legal definitions from Roth or the later Miller. For that reason, I felt it was important/interesting enough to include in this series.
To set the scene, here’s what else was happening in 1964: The country was still reeling from President Kennedy’s assassination. The Beatles, Mary Poppins, and the Ford Mustang all premiered in the United States. Congress passed the first major piece of American civil rights legislation. The pilot of Star Trek began filming. The internet did not exist.
The case
Nico Jacobellis ran a movie theater in Cleveland Heights, Ohio.
He was charged with two counts of possessing and exhibiting an obscene film under the Ohio Revised Code: “Selling, exhibiting, and possessing obscene literature or drugs for criminal purposes” (§ 2905.34, since repealed). I’m not going to quote the statute here because it’s the standard verbal soup of legalese, but it’s interesting to note that this rule combines pornography, contraception, and abortion materials as the same type of crime.
Jacobellis was fined a total of $2,500, which is about $21,000 in 2021 money.
His lawyer appealed on the grounds that 1) the film in question was not obscene, and 2) that Jacobellis thinking this did not then knowingly exhibit an obscene film.
The original conviction in Jacobellis was affirmed by the state supreme court, and they appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
The content
The obscene material in question was the 1958 french film Les Amants (The Lovers).
Unlike the difficult-to-find material in Roth, this film is part of the Criterion Collection and thus available in full online.
The Lovers is the classic story of a depressed woman who thinks happiness will be found when she finds the right man, so she keeps impulsively going through lovers and doesn’t understand why she’s still miserable.
That’s my summary, at least. Criterion bills it as “A deeply felt and luxuriously filmed fairy tale for grown-ups.”
Tbh I found it extremely boring.
I’m not a fan of old movies in general, and the ~75 minutes of build up to the sex scene did a poor job of holding my attention. The “romance” aspect hasn’t aged as poorly as other old films I’ve seen, but it’s still not great, and there’s some very uncomfortable “token resistance/playing hard to get” moments.
The “obscenity” at the center of this case is, unsurprisingly, very tame by modern standards. At the end of the film, the main character (Jeanne) and her new boytoy (Bernard) make out in a boat, then go back to her room to have sex (in the same house where her husband and other lover are also staying, which made me feel so anxious).
After they make out a bit and disrobe they lay on the bed and we get the only truly scandalous-by-modern-standards moment, where you can briefly see an exposed “female nipple.” (gasp)
In modern America, exposed female nips in a sexual content are usually enough to force an ‘R’ rating for a film (although remember this is a French movie, a country that is generally more friendly to that sort of thing).
The sex is artistically shot and the geometry seems to indicate that he’s going down on her, which is always nice to see represented in media, especially classic media. It never shows anything below the waist, and focuses mostly on the expressions of pleasure on Jeanne’s face.
At the end of the scene Jeanne flings a hand up in ecstasy and slides it along the sheets. The camera pans away from her face to focus on her hand, which is then grabbed by Bernard (this is where the still for the modern version of the movie poster comes from).
The scene then skips ahead to the afterglow and overly romantic pillow talk, and we’re out of obscenity territory. The whole thing is maybe three minutes.
The only other item of particular note in this movie is that the upper-class high-femme lead has visible underarm hair in multiple scenes, something I would dearly love to see more of in modern media (this is another thing the French have a friendlier attitude towards).
The Ohio Supreme Court had this to say about the movie when they confirmed Jacobellis’ conviction (cases concerned with state law appeal to the state’s supreme court, and if someone still isn’t happy with the outcome they can then appeal up to the Federal Supreme Court).
“This court viewed Les Amants (The Lovers). The film ran for 90 minutes. To me, it was 87 minutes of boredom induced by the vapid drivel appearing on the screen and three minutes of complete revulsion during the showing of an act of perverted obscenity. Les Amants (The Lovers) was not hard-core pornography, i.e., filth for filth’s sake. It was worse. It was filth for money’s sake.”
I’m not sure how “filth for filth’s sake” would differ from “filth for money’s sake” under capitalism, but ok.
The court
The Supreme Court didn’t change a ton between Roth in 1955 and Jacobellis in 1964 (other than color photography becoming commonplace).
Public domain photo taken from Oyez
Imagine those nine old white men in a room watching Les Amants together, notepads to hand and clerks assembled behind them.
Warren (middle of photo) was still Chief Justice and only three justices had left the court since Roth, none of whom were opinion authors, so I won’t bother naming them here.
Justice Brennan (fourth from left in photo) authored the majority opinion for both Jacobellis and Roth. Brennan is a big player when it comes to obscenity rulings, and will appear in later cases as well.
Justice Harlan (far right in above photo), author of one of the dissenting opinions in Roth, is also still around and will be heard from again to dissent in Jacobellis.
This was the same court that unanimously upheld the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (when it was immediately challenged in court), and confirmed that voting was a fundamental right in Reynold v. Sims.
The Jacobellis case was overturned 6-3, with the three dissenters scattered across the political spectrum according to Oyez’s ideology scale. This meant Nico Jacobellis was declared not guilty, and didn’t have to pay the fine.
Justices in favor of overturning:
- Black
- Douglas
- Brennan
- Stewart
- White
- Goldberg
Justices in favor of affirming:
- Warren
- Clark
- Harlan
The consequences
As I mentioned at the beginning, the Jacobellis decision didn’t matter a whole lot (except for Nico Jacobellis himself of course, for whom it mattered a great deal).
The actual outcome of the case can be summarized very quickly by this quote from the first paragraph of the decision:
“We conclude that the film is not obscene, and that the judgment must accordingly be reversed.”
Justice Brennan, writing for the majority opinion
The famous quote comes from Justice Stewart’s concurring opinion, which is quite short (only 141 words) so I’ll present it here in full: (emphasis mine)
“It is possible to read the Court’s opinion in Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California, in a variety of ways. In saying this, I imply no criticism of the Court, which, in those cases, was faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable. I have reached the conclusion, which I think is confirmed at least by negative implication in the Court’s decisions since Roth and Alberts, that, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
Chief Justice Warren, who called the desire for erotic materials a “morbid and shameful craving” in his Roth opinion, dissents on the Jacobellis decision, asking “who can define ‘hard core pornography’ with any greater clarity than ‘obscenity’?”
Which, really, is a great question, and the whole point of this investigative series.
However he goes on to say that while the Court is arguing over definitions, “those who profit from the commercial exploitation of obscenity would continue to ply their trade unmolested.” Personally I think it’d be great if not molesting people was the goal of the Supreme Court.
Warren also doubles down on the Roth definition, disagreeing with the majority opinion in saying that the “community standards” therein don’t imply a national standard, but should be left up to the states, even if those states won’t agree with each other.
This particular line of argument is moot in the age of the internet, but it makes up much of the hand-wringing in early obscenity cases. It is the entire basis for Justice Harlan’s dissent here in Jacobellis, as well as his dissent in Roth.
None of the three dissenting justices argue that the content is obscene. Their arguments are almost all about ‘should it be our job to make this decision.’
Ironically, two of the concurring justices also don’t think the Supreme Court should be making decisions on what is obscene, but rather than leaving it up to the states they take a more pure free speech stance and don’t think anyone should be deciding what is obscene, so they’re happy to join in overturning this case.
The conclusion
Other than a new catchy quote, not much was changed by the Jacobellis decision. However, Chief Justice Warren in his dissenting opinion foreshadows the next big fight in American obscenity law: context.
“In my opinion, the use to which various materials are put — not just the words and pictures themselves — must be considered in determining whether or not the materials are obscene. A technical or legal treatise on pornography may well be inoffensive under most circumstances, but, at the same time, ‘obscene’ in the extreme when sold or displayed to children.
In the instant case, for example, the advertisements published to induce the public to view the motion picture provide some evidence of the film’s dominant theme: ‘When all conventions explode . . . in the most daring love story ever filmed!’ ‘As close to authentic amour as is possible on the screen.’ ‘The frankest love scenes yet seen on film.’ ‘Contains one of the longest and most sensuous love scenes to be seen in this county.’”
There will be much more discussion of context and marketing in the next edition of this series, which – I pinky promise this time – will cover Memoirs v. Massachusetts and the infamous Fanny Hill.
148,120 replies on “Jacobellis v. Ohio”
amlodipine pronunciation [url=https://amlodipine20.us]what is amlodipine[/url] norvasc drug class
amlodipine interactions list amlodipine medication generic norvasc
[url=https://flexeril.store/]order generic flexeril 15mg[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]flexeril sale[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]order flexeril generic[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cyclobenzaprine 15mg us[/url]
warnings for amlodipine norvasc drug class interactions for amlodipine
[url=https://flexeril.store/]generic cyclobenzaprine 15mg[/url]
It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you
some interesting things or suggestions. Maybe you could write next articles referring to this article.
I wish to read even more things about it!
[url=https://flexeril.store/]order flexeril for sale[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]buy cyclobenzaprine online cheap[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cyclobenzaprine us[/url]
30 mg sildenafil viagra prescription sildenafil mexico pharmacy
I visited various websites except the audio feature for audio songs present
at this website is in fact wonderful.
[url=https://flexeril.store/]order cyclobenzaprine for sale[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]generic cyclobenzaprine[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]flexeril 15mg ca[/url]
levitra drug vardenafil paypal levitra discounts
cheap clomid in the usa[/url]
Can I simply just say what a relief to discover someone that actually knows what they are talking about on the net. You definitely know how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people must read this and understand this side of your story. I was surprised that you’re not more popular because you surely have the gift.
I’ll immediately take hold of your rss as I can not find your
e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service.
Do you have any? Kindly allow me realize so that I could subscribe.
Thanks.
cialis 20 mg cialis and viagra cialis price generic
Hi there, i read your blog occasionally and i own a
similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam feedback?
If so how do you reduce it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?
I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any assistance
is very much appreciated.
sildenafil india pharmacy [url=https://viagra742.us]sildenafil soft tabs[/url] natural viagra gnc
otc viagra walmart does viagra work buy generic viagra
gabapentin controlled substance neurontin 800 gabapentin withdrawal symptoms
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cyclobenzaprine 15mg canada[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cyclobenzaprine 15mg usa[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]flexeril brand[/url]
levitra generic vardenafil [url=https://levitra742.us]levitra soft tabs[/url] vilitra 60mg vardenafil
vardenafil tablets price levitra dosage options levitra from india
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cyclobenzaprine online buy[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cyclobenzaprine buy online[/url]
viagra india 100mg
viagra india 100mg
generic for cialis [url=https://cialis742.us]research chemicals tadalafil[/url] cialis and depression
cialis medication price tadalafil 20 mg warnings for tadalafil
kamagra[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cheap cyclobenzaprine[/url]
buy prednisone online[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]flexeril[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]order flexeril 15mg sale[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]flexeril 15mg canada[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]buy cyclobenzaprine 15mg online[/url]
antabuse over the counter generic[/url]
gabapentin 600 mg [url=https://gabapentin19.us]gabapentin high[/url] gabapentin controlled substance
what is gabapentin gabapentin controlled substance gabapentin 300mg capsules
Hello everybody! I lack to dispensation what fantasies can be institute on the
[url=http://www.mirafikirevi.com/iletisim/]hentai sex fuck 3d video monster tentacle[/url]
[url=https://shakedtavor.co.il/#m134]3d toon movies[/url]
[url=https://typmanda.blogg.se/2013/january/mandag.html]nice toys 3d porn[/url]
It’s implausible, but from such comics in five minutes you can cum more than once! )))
viagra prank sildenafil 50 mg viagra on sale
cialis with dapoxetine[/url]
viagra plus [url=https://viagra741.us]prescription free viagra[/url] female viagra
best natural viagra buy generic viagra buying viagra
AllExpress Endless coupons, discounts, promotions and flash deals. Competitive Prices On More Than 100 Million Items. Check Out All Deals on AllExpress. 24*7 Customer care. Buyer’s Protection. Free Shipping Worldwide. Secure Payment Method.
[url=https://bit.ly/35c29AV]high quality. Men’s bags . to anywhere in the world[/url]
[url=https://bit.ly/35c29AV]The best products. Roller skates, skateboards and scooters . to any place[/url]
[url=https://bit.ly/3cpTG0U]very fast. Smartwatch and gadgets .Anytime[/url]
[url=https://torgovaya.xyz/ali]inexpensive. Team sports . to any place[/url]
[url=https://bit.ly/2TKdfKF]very fast. Men’s trousers . to any place[/url]
@a
Hi there would you mind letting me know which
webhost you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different web browsers and
I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you recommend a good internet hosting provider
at a reasonable price? Thank you, I appreciate it!
sildenafil canada [url=https://viagra739.us]viagra sildenafil[/url] viagra sales
viagra alternative gnc viagra discount coupons sildenafil citrate 20mg
viagra dosages order viagra online buy generic sildenafil
Hi would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using?
I’m looking to start my own blog soon but I’m having a tough time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something
unique. P.S My apologies for being off-topic but I had to ask!
tadalafil 5mg generic cialis reliable sites cialis cheaper
cost of cialis [url=https://cialis741.us]tadalafil prescription cost[/url] cialis dosage
tadalafil research liquid on line cialis cialis overnight delivery
lasix mexico[/url]
BqpNlejarLXEg
cialis with dapoxetine [url=https://cialis739.us]real cialis 20mg[/url] cialis reviews
liquid cialis review tadalafil citrate liquid tadalafil natural
best tadalafil generic cialis dosage tadalafpis maxim peptide tadalafil
These are in fact enormous ideas in on the topic of blogging.
You have touched some fastidious points here.
Any way keep up wrinting.
women taking viagra [url=https://viagrapillsweb.us]sildenafil dosage[/url] sildenafil 100mg india
viagra professional homemade viagra online viagra pharmacy
I am sure this paragraph has touched all the internet people, its really really pleasant paragraph
on building up new website.
Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this site.
It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s hard to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and visual
appearance. I must say you’ve done a excellent job
with this. Additionally, the blog loads extremely quick for me on Internet explorer.
Excellent Blog!
[url=https://flexeril.store/]flexeril over the counter[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]purchase flexeril for sale[/url]
sildenafil 100mg mexico
sildenafil 100mg mexico
[url=https://flexeril.store/]cheap cyclobenzaprine 15mg[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]order flexeril generic[/url]
cialis without a doctor’s prescription[/url]
what is sildenafil sildenafil citrate stronghealthstore sildenafil medication
[url=https://flexeril.store/]buy cyclobenzaprine 15mg without prescription[/url]
[url=https://flexeril.store/]generic flexeril 15mg[/url]
tadalafil alcohol [url=https://cialiswebpills.us]cialis medication price[/url] tadalafil sublingual
real cialis pills cialis pharmacy coupon reddit cialis
[url=https://velpanex.ru/shop/18/desc/osimert]Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) – ПОЛНЫЙ аналог Tagrisso/Тагриссо[/url]
Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) – лекарство, направленное на борьбу с раковыми клетками в легких, тем самым уменьшая размеры опухоли. Действие осуществляется за счет ингибирования тирозинкиназы. Эффективен данный препарат в первую очередь в отношении сенсибилизирующих мутаций, а именно – Т790М
Форма выпуска
Представляет собой покрытые оболочкой капсулы. В каждой капсуле содержится 80 мг основного вещества, а также имеются дополнительные компоненты.
Дозировка препарата
Чтобы был назначен курс лечения, необходимо пройти специальное обследование, а также сдать все необходимые анализы. Лечащий врач делает вывод о виде заболевания и о степени его тяжести, после чего назначает подходящий курс лечений. Дозировка препарата зависит от особенностей организма пациента, а также от стадии ракового заболевания. У нас вы можете [b]Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) купить[/b] уже сегодня. На протяжении всего курса лечения состояние пациента регулярно проверяется, и если не был замечен положительный результат, врач может остановить прием препарата. Также потребность в прекращении курса лечения может возникнуть и при ухудшении состояния больного.
Показания к применению
Прием препарата назначается при раке легких. Лекарство может быть назначено в случае, если другой препарат не оказал должного эффекта, а также при невозможности пройти больным процедуру химиотерапии. На [b]Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) цена[/b] указана на нашем сайте. Мы гарантируем качество всех лекарств, представленных в каталоге.
Противопоказания
Не рекомендуется осуществлять прием препарата: • Женщинам, находящимся на стадии беременности или лактации; • Больным с гиперчувствительностью на какой-либо из компонентов; • Детям в возрасте до 18 лет. Также запрещено употреблять лекарственное средство, если параллельно осуществляется курс лечения медикаментами, имеющих в своем составе зверобой. Актуальная на [b]Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) стоимость[/b] указана в каталоге, заказ вы можете оформить прямо сейчас на сайте.
Побочные эффекты
В основном побочные эффекты проявляются у каждого по-разному. Это зависит от индивидуальных особенностей организма пациента. Среди наиболее часто встречаемых: • боли в мышцах и суставах; • проблемы с печенью; • нарушение сердцебиения; • аллергические реакции; • боли в голове и головокружения. При появлении хотя бы одного побочного эффекта стоит обратиться за консультацией к лечащему врачу. Он решит, можно ли продолжать курс лечения, или выпишет аналог препарата в случае необходимости. В большинстве случаев [b]Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) отзывы[/b] положительные.
Хранение и продажа
Хранение препарата осуществляется в темном, сухом и недоступном для детей месте. Срок годности составляет два года. Продажа лекарственного средства осуществляется по рецепту врача. Но у нас вы можете заказать препарат в онлайн-режиме.
[url=https://velpanex.ru/shop/18/desc/osimert]Osimert (Осимертиниб 80 мг) – Осимерт (Osimertinib) – ПОЛНЫЙ аналог Tagrisso/Тагриссо[/url]
[url=https://velpanex.ru/shop/18/desc/osimert]осимертиниб купить +в москве[/url]
LIABshrVGQXjn
disulfiram 500 mg tablets[/url]
cialis medication
cialis medication
tadalafil alcohol tadalafil uses tadalafil price comparison
Pjidfhisofkcwspfjowfkpwlfpjwofk rwkfpwkgowjkfwjgoowfkpwg
Nifhfeidfjwofjowhfie jfjeofwofjwoefjwoj irwojdwohfiewjfowfie
Mcniscswhfuhicfj ijfwokfdwhfiwjbskgk gnrejgbskesghegnr gkejgejgj
Ojffsfjhnwsfjebgejfwjfiehi jiffniehfshiufhaeifnjskgehiwuw fjefje
Ojbcjdhswv bjwksbdhwjsvdhfwjb jbfjksafbejfbejfbejbcsufuj
Gjsbjfcwhdnwdwhnfw hiwshfjabhfewbfjekb fuabfiuebfbcdsjfbewiufbeh
https://oituryufhcnjdjqajdsfsjk.com
KdwyeuuiwiosIBHBCFDHKFJJ FJKBJKWFJFBHEAKNDSJAKFGBSHFAWJDJESBG
Hello,
Download high quality music: http://0daymusic.org/premium.php
Label, LIVESETS, Music Videos, TV Series.
Download Dance, Electro, House, Techno, Trance, Pop, Rock, Rap…
Best regards,
0day MP3s
XOsxTcoapR