This is the second in my series of Supreme Court cases related to pornography. Last time I promised I would do Memoirs v. Massachusetts next, but I completely forgot about Jacobellis v. Ohio which, for reasons that will become clear quite quickly, can’t be skipped. If this kind of thing intrigues you, check out the previous post on Roth v. United States or my other ongoing series on the details of social media sex policy.
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964
Official citation and full opinion text: 378 U.S. 184
“I shall not today attempt further to define [hard core pornography], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”Justice Stewart in his concurring opinion for Jacobellis
Jacobellis is not one of the great precedent-setting obscenity cases. It looked at a specific piece of content, and decided it did not qualify as obscene under the Roth definition. The full decision for Jacobellis is rather short – only 6,484 words, compared to Roth’s 12,066 (six years earlier) or Memoirs’ beefy 15,911 (two years later, and the next case to modify the obscenity definition).
It is in Jacobellis that the famous line “I know it when I see it” occurs, which has come to be shorthand for the vague and subjective nature of ‘pornography’ classification. Many Americans are familiar with that quote but not the actual legal definitions from Roth or the later Miller. For that reason, I felt it was important/interesting enough to include in this series.
To set the scene, here’s what else was happening in 1964: The country was still reeling from President Kennedy’s assassination. The Beatles, Mary Poppins, and the Ford Mustang all premiered in the United States. Congress passed the first major piece of American civil rights legislation. The pilot of Star Trek began filming. The internet did not exist.
Nico Jacobellis ran a movie theater in Cleveland Heights, Ohio.
He was charged with two counts of possessing and exhibiting an obscene film under the Ohio Revised Code: “Selling, exhibiting, and possessing obscene literature or drugs for criminal purposes” (§ 2905.34, since repealed). I’m not going to quote the statute here because it’s the standard verbal soup of legalese, but it’s interesting to note that this rule combines pornography, contraception, and abortion materials as the same type of crime.
Jacobellis was fined a total of $2,500, which is about $21,000 in 2021 money.
His lawyer appealed on the grounds that 1) the film in question was not obscene, and 2) that Jacobellis thinking this did not then knowingly exhibit an obscene film.
The original conviction in Jacobellis was affirmed by the state supreme court, and they appealed to the Federal Supreme Court.
The obscene material in question was the 1958 french film Les Amants (The Lovers).
Unlike the difficult-to-find material in Roth, this film is part of the Criterion Collection and thus available in full online.
The Lovers is the classic story of a depressed woman who thinks happiness will be found when she finds the right man, so she keeps impulsively going through lovers and doesn’t understand why she’s still miserable.
That’s my summary, at least. Criterion bills it as “A deeply felt and luxuriously filmed fairy tale for grown-ups.”
Tbh I found it extremely boring.
I’m not a fan of old movies in general, and the ~75 minutes of build up to the sex scene did a poor job of holding my attention. The “romance” aspect hasn’t aged as poorly as other old films I’ve seen, but it’s still not great, and there’s some very uncomfortable “token resistance/playing hard to get” moments.
The “obscenity” at the center of this case is, unsurprisingly, very tame by modern standards. At the end of the film, the main character (Jeanne) and her new boytoy (Bernard) make out in a boat, then go back to her room to have sex (in the same house where her husband and other lover are also staying, which made me feel so anxious).
After they make out a bit and disrobe they lay on the bed and we get the only truly scandalous-by-modern-standards moment, where you can briefly see an exposed “female nipple.” (gasp)
In modern America, exposed female nips in a sexual content are usually enough to force an ‘R’ rating for a film (although remember this is a French movie, a country that is generally more friendly to that sort of thing).
The sex is artistically shot and the geometry seems to indicate that he’s going down on her, which is always nice to see represented in media, especially classic media. It never shows anything below the waist, and focuses mostly on the expressions of pleasure on Jeanne’s face.
At the end of the scene Jeanne flings a hand up in ecstasy and slides it along the sheets. The camera pans away from her face to focus on her hand, which is then grabbed by Bernard (this is where the still for the modern version of the movie poster comes from).
The scene then skips ahead to the afterglow and overly romantic pillow talk, and we’re out of obscenity territory. The whole thing is maybe three minutes.
The only other item of particular note in this movie is that the upper-class high-femme lead has visible underarm hair in multiple scenes, something I would dearly love to see more of in modern media (this is another thing the French have a friendlier attitude towards).
The Ohio Supreme Court had this to say about the movie when they confirmed Jacobellis’ conviction (cases concerned with state law appeal to the state’s supreme court, and if someone still isn’t happy with the outcome they can then appeal up to the Federal Supreme Court).
“This court viewed Les Amants (The Lovers). The film ran for 90 minutes. To me, it was 87 minutes of boredom induced by the vapid drivel appearing on the screen and three minutes of complete revulsion during the showing of an act of perverted obscenity. Les Amants (The Lovers) was not hard-core pornography, i.e., filth for filth’s sake. It was worse. It was filth for money’s sake.”
I’m not sure how “filth for filth’s sake” would differ from “filth for money’s sake” under capitalism, but ok.
The Supreme Court didn’t change a ton between Roth in 1955 and Jacobellis in 1964 (other than color photography becoming commonplace).
Imagine those nine old white men in a room watching Les Amants together, notepads to hand and clerks assembled behind them.
Warren (middle of photo) was still Chief Justice and only three justices had left the court since Roth, none of whom were opinion authors, so I won’t bother naming them here.
Justice Brennan (fourth from left in photo) authored the majority opinion for both Jacobellis and Roth. Brennan is a big player when it comes to obscenity rulings, and will appear in later cases as well.
Justice Harlan (far right in above photo), author of one of the dissenting opinions in Roth, is also still around and will be heard from again to dissent in Jacobellis.
This was the same court that unanimously upheld the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (when it was immediately challenged in court), and confirmed that voting was a fundamental right in Reynold v. Sims.
The Jacobellis case was overturned 6-3, with the three dissenters scattered across the political spectrum according to Oyez’s ideology scale. This meant Nico Jacobellis was declared not guilty, and didn’t have to pay the fine.
Justices in favor of overturning:
Justices in favor of affirming:
As I mentioned at the beginning, the Jacobellis decision didn’t matter a whole lot (except for Nico Jacobellis himself of course, for whom it mattered a great deal).
The actual outcome of the case can be summarized very quickly by this quote from the first paragraph of the decision:
“We conclude that the film is not obscene, and that the judgment must accordingly be reversed.”Justice Brennan, writing for the majority opinion
The famous quote comes from Justice Stewart’s concurring opinion, which is quite short (only 141 words) so I’ll present it here in full: (emphasis mine)
“It is possible to read the Court’s opinion in Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California, in a variety of ways. In saying this, I imply no criticism of the Court, which, in those cases, was faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable. I have reached the conclusion, which I think is confirmed at least by negative implication in the Court’s decisions since Roth and Alberts, that, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
Chief Justice Warren, who called the desire for erotic materials a “morbid and shameful craving” in his Roth opinion, dissents on the Jacobellis decision, asking “who can define ‘hard core pornography’ with any greater clarity than ‘obscenity’?”
Which, really, is a great question, and the whole point of this investigative series.
However he goes on to say that while the Court is arguing over definitions, “those who profit from the commercial exploitation of obscenity would continue to ply their trade unmolested.” Personally I think it’d be great if not molesting people was the goal of the Supreme Court.
Warren also doubles down on the Roth definition, disagreeing with the majority opinion in saying that the “community standards” therein don’t imply a national standard, but should be left up to the states, even if those states won’t agree with each other.
This particular line of argument is moot in the age of the internet, but it makes up much of the hand-wringing in early obscenity cases. It is the entire basis for Justice Harlan’s dissent here in Jacobellis, as well as his dissent in Roth.
None of the three dissenting justices argue that the content is obscene. Their arguments are almost all about ‘should it be our job to make this decision.’
Ironically, two of the concurring justices also don’t think the Supreme Court should be making decisions on what is obscene, but rather than leaving it up to the states they take a more pure free speech stance and don’t think anyone should be deciding what is obscene, so they’re happy to join in overturning this case.
Other than a new catchy quote, not much was changed by the Jacobellis decision. However, Chief Justice Warren in his dissenting opinion foreshadows the next big fight in American obscenity law: context.
“In my opinion, the use to which various materials are put — not just the words and pictures themselves — must be considered in determining whether or not the materials are obscene. A technical or legal treatise on pornography may well be inoffensive under most circumstances, but, at the same time, ‘obscene’ in the extreme when sold or displayed to children.
In the instant case, for example, the advertisements published to induce the public to view the motion picture provide some evidence of the film’s dominant theme: ‘When all conventions explode . . . in the most daring love story ever filmed!’ ‘As close to authentic amour as is possible on the screen.’ ‘The frankest love scenes yet seen on film.’ ‘Contains one of the longest and most sensuous love scenes to be seen in this county.’”
There will be much more discussion of context and marketing in the next edition of this series, which – I pinky promise this time – will cover Memoirs v. Massachusetts and the infamous Fanny Hill.
148,120 replies on “Jacobellis v. Ohio”
interactions for clindamycin [url=https://clindamycin22.us]clindamycin for dogs[/url] clindamycin lotion
clindamycin antibiotic clindamycin for dogs clindamycin interactions
cephalexin 250 mg [url=https://cephalexin22.us]keflex price without insurance[/url] cephalexin 500 mg capsule
keflex dosage genericsbb keflex 500 mg is cephalexin penicillin
cefdinir 300mg [url=https://cefdinir22.us]side effects of cefdinir[/url] side effects of cefdinir
cefdinir 300 mg cefdinir generation omnicef
When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each
time a comment is added I get several emails with the same comment.
Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks a lot!
azithromycin 250mg coupon [url=https://azithromycin22.us]zithromax antibiotic[/url] zithromax tablets for sale
side effects for azithromycin azithromycin for uti zithromax cream
It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be
happy. I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you few interesting things or advice.
Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.
I want to read even more things about it!
erythromycin eye ointment erythromycin dosage for adults erythromycin gel price
I like what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and exposure!
Keep up the amazing works guys I’ve added you guys to blogroll.
amoxicillin for fish [url=https://augmentin22.us]amoxicillin 500 mg capsules[/url] amoxicillin for ear infection
amoxicillin capsules amoxicillin dosage for children what is augmentin
warnings for clindamycin clindamycin treats what infection clindamycin phosphate topical lotion
Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog
and I am impressed! Extremely helpful info specifically
the last part :) I care for such information much. I was seeking this particular info for a long time.
Thank you and best of luck.
donepezil hcl warnings [url=https://aricept22.us]donepezil[/url] interactions for donepezil
donepezil hydrochloride aricept for dementia donepezil side effects
cephalexin 500 mg capsule cephalexin brand name india keflex side effects
It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
I’ve read this post and if I could I want to suggest you
some interesting things or tips. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
I want to read more things about it!
interactions for cefdinir interactions for cefdinir omnicef
generic amoxicillin cost [url=https://amoxicillin22.us]amoxicillin cost australia[/url] amoxicillin 250mg
amoxicillin dosage for children allergic reaction to amoxicillin amoxicillin dosage for children
I simply could not depart your web site before suggesting
that I extremely loved the usual information an individual supply in your
visitors? Is going to be back often in order to
check out new posts
azithromycin 500g tablets zithromax 250 mg azithromycin 500 mg
I visited several web sites but the audio feature for
audio songs existing at this web site is truly superb.
amoxicillin clavulanic acid amoxicillin uses augmentin generic names
Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular post!
It’s the little changes that will make the biggest
changes. Many thanks for sharing!
acyclovir 800mg tablets [url=https://acyclovir22.us]acyclovir for shingles[/url] acyclovir 400mg tab
acyclovir side effects acyclovir cost uk acyclovir cream
sixanal.com is a free porn install featuring thousands of https://www.sixanal.com/pics/blind-folded-wifey-nicole-opens-up-her-gams-and-gets.html galleries updated daily.
Be infallible to visit [url=https://www.techplus-et.com/index.php/solutions/datacenter/#comment-61037]webcam chat room adult no rules[/url] including [url=http://taxidinamit.ru/component/content/article/1216.html]anal bbw picture[/url]
SixAnal.com had a unclean milf today. Makayla a heavy tits piquant mom stopped beyond to have nailed approximately a younger stud. Jeremy was the people pith today and he couldn’t discontinuation to fuck her brains out. She was on him from the declaration action. She sucked his dick like it was her gauge meal. She took it the predominating and Jeremy could exclusive very recently stand up himself from cumming. She wanted that gargantuan dick ungregarious her thought. He fucked her every which control he could close the pool. He uninterrupted stuck it up her ass which she loved. This termagant was a vagary and demanded he cum in her articulation so she could swallow.
Be sure to by [url=https://akbarmontada.com/mo-thay-minh-sudung-giay-lau-la-diem-bao-gi?unapproved=767503&moderation-hash=0473c5ec9b6abc8dba294922489baf7b#comment-767503]ass hole licking[/url] furthermore [url=http://www.amaterracrianza.com/contact-us/?contact-form-id=23&contact-form-sent=50194&contact-form-hash=d62c464153ad9a215e267c2465919460ee2cfd3f&_wpnonce=2f7319ac05]blonde bbw anal[/url]
Excellent post! We are linking to this particularly great post on our site.
Keep up the great writing.
donepezil donepezil 5 mg aricept 10 mg
I have been browsing on-line greater than three hours these days, yet I by no
means found any interesting article like yours. It’s lovely price enough for me.
In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you probably did, the web will
be much more useful than ever before.
amoxicillin 500 mg tablet amoxicillin suspension amoxicillin no prescription
I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today,
yet I never found any interesting article like yours.
It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as
you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.
Поставляем любую продукцию из Китая по самым низким ценам. Сотрудничаем с китайскими производителями напрямую.
acyclovir 400mg tab acyclovir cream acyclovir 800 mg price
zithromax z pak] zithromax 500mg price azithromycin 250mg
Good choose, fast delivery time, average prices. All this words about this service. I am a customer of this service 1.5 years, like it
Download Music Scene Releases: https://0daymusic.org
Server’s capacity 186 TB Music
Support for FTP, FTPS, SFTP, HTTP, HTTPS.
Best regards, Rafael
cialis dapoxetine [url=https://tadalafil733.us]is cialis safe[/url] cialis capsule 5mg
cost cialis australia generic cialis 20mg cialis average price
I constantly emailed this web site post page to all my friends, as if
like to read it after that my contacts will too.
cialis generic canada [url=https://tadalafil20.us]generic cialis daily[/url] cialis mastercard
purchase tadalafil online cialis for women medicine cialis tablets
viagra drug [url=https://sildenafil20.us]viagra savings card[/url] cheap viagra
viagra pill viagra on steroids viagra 25mg cost
If some one wishes to be updated with most recent
technologies afterward he must be go to see this
website and be up to date all the time.
tadalafil tadalafromcanada [url=https://cialis742.us]tadalafil 30mg liquid[/url] real cialis 20mg
cialis super active cialis canada pharmacy canadian cialis 20mg
cialis 200mg price [url=https://cialis734.us]cialis price increase[/url] tadalafil cost india
cialis daily australia cialis 20mg price cialis cost australia
Don’t maid these astounding matured stories!
[url=https://x3dporn.net/galleries/hedonism-island-alison-hale.html]Hedonism Island- Alison Hale[/url]
AnalSlutty.com is a untenanted porn install featuring thousands of [url=https://www.analslutty.com/pornstar/aj-applegate/]Aj Applegate Anal[/url] galleries updated daily.
Be unwavering to visit [url=http://www.acquiro.dk/?p=1684&cpage=1&unapproved=49168&moderation-hash=369a8f884c62f4f004e169d753618544#comment-49168]indian fucking sex show[/url] along with [url=https://buckshotporn.com/?p=114&unapproved=44413&moderation-hash=8039318553541baf1addaca5d32e0f30#comment-44413]russian mature anal tube[/url]
Bán TWITTER CỔ REG 2009>2015 – Instagram accounts
purchase levitra [url=https://levitra734.us]levitra vardenafil 40 mg[/url] vardenafil generic uk
levitra price compare otc levitra buy vardenafil
Всегда готовы предложить профессиональные услуги:
“Максимально быстрое устранение веб-сайтов конкурентов или мошенников!”
Каким методом это делают наши эксперты?!
– У нас опыт – более 10 лет.
– Конфиденциальная методика.
– Наращивание ссылочной массы порно и вирусными ссылками.
– Любой поисковик мгновенно реагирует на наши применяющиеся технологии.
– Тексты на онлайн-сайте спамятся, они становятся неуникальными.
– У нас серьезные возможности и многолетний практический опыт в данном направлении.
Стоимость услуги $80
Оплата: Qiwi, Яндекс.Деньги, Bitcoin, Visa, MasterCard…
А тАкож Работаем со Студиями!
[url=https://www.alkraft.ru/techno-doors]купить напольный люк[/url] или [url=https://www.alkraft.ru/production/brigadir]ревизионные люки от производителя[/url]
sildenafil 50mg [url=https://viagra733.us]viagra pill cutter[/url] sildenafil 200mg
viagra sex womens viagra pill viagra alternatives
It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you few interesting things or suggestions.
Maybe you could write next articles referring to this article.
I want to read more things about it!
vardenafil price in india vardenafil cost levitra 10mg price